Social Media Update – Meta and YouTube found guilty, a landmark verdict on social media addiction
- bySudha Saxena
- 28 Mar, 2026
Friends, in today's modern age, social media addiction has become commonplace. To curb this addiction, in a significant legal development in the US, a Los Angeles jury delivered a historic verdict, holding Meta and YouTube responsible for harming a young woman's mental health. This could spark a major debate about the accountability of tech companies. Let's learn the full details.
Background of the case and compensation
The lawsuit was filed by Cailey, a 20-year-old woman who claimed that excessive social media use during her childhood had a devastating impact on her mental health.
The jury ruled in his favor and awarded him $3 million (approximately ₹28 crore) in compensation.
Responsibility for the damages was apportioned, with Meta being held responsible for 70% and YouTube for 30%.
Early onset and lack of safety measures
Cailey started using YouTube at just six years old and Instagram at nine.
She said these platforms failed to properly verify her age or prevent her from accessing them.
Over time, she became isolated and increasingly dependent on social media.
Impact on mental health
By the age of 10, he started showing symptoms of anxiety and depression.
Later, doctors confirmed these diseases.
Due to excessive use of filters, she also developed an unhealthy fixation on her physical appearance.
Eventually, she was diagnosed with Body Dysmorphic Disorder.
Arguments presented in court
Cailey's lawyers argued that social media platforms are deliberately designed to be addictive.
Features like 'infinite scrolling' were introduced as tools to keep users engaged for longer, especially targeting younger audiences.
Tech companies' response
Meta dismissed these claims, saying that social media wasn't the only culprit behind Cailey's troubles.
The company has expressed disagreement with the decision and is considering legal options.
Similarly, Google also announced plans to challenge the decision, arguing that YouTube had been unfairly represented.
Public reaction and future impact
Parents present outside the court welcomed the decision and called it a big victory for the safety of children.
Many people claimed that their children have also faced similar problems due to excessive use of social media.
Experts believe that this decision reflects the growing concern of people about the negative impact of social media.
With many more such cases currently pending in court, the legal pressure on tech companies is expected to increase in the coming months.
PC:Journal India






