Send him to UP, we'll treat him, Yogi's big attack on Abu Azmi

 | 
sdgsdfsaw

CM Yogi said that Aurangzeb's father Shah Jahan writes in his biography that God forbid that such a wretched person should not be born. He had imprisoned his father in the Agra Fort.

Lucknow: Yogi Adityanath fiercely attacked the Samajwadi Party in the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Council on Wednesday. Yogi Adityanath fiercely targeted the Samajwadi Party on the Aurangzeb controversy going on in Maharashtra. CM Yogi said that the Samajwadi Party considers Aurangzeb as its ideal. CM Yogi said without taking any name that expel that bastard from the party. Or else send him to UP. CM Yogi surrounded the Samajwadi Party on this issue. Let us tell you that these days Samajwadi Party leader Abu Azmi is in the news for his comment on Aurangzeb. 

It is the habit of Samajwadi Party to curse the heritage of India. Unfortunately, they have considered Aurangzeb as an ideal. Aurangzeb's father Shah Jahan writes in his biography that God forbid that such a wretch should not be born in anyone's house. He imprisoned his father in Agra Fort. Kept him yearning for every drop of water.

Yogi Adityanath, Chief Minister, Uttar Pradesh

null

CM Yogi said that Aurangzeb's father Shah Jahan writes in his biography that God should not give birth to such a wretched person. He imprisoned his father in the Agra Fort. Kept him thirsting for every drop of water. Those who praise Aurangzeb should read Shah Jahan. Samajwadi Party considers the fanatic and cruel ruler who attacked India as an ideal. No civilized Muslim has named his son Aurangzeb. While cursing Aurangzeb, he wrote that this Hindu is better than you who serves his parents while alive and performs their tarpan after their death. 

Action against Abu Azmi in Maharashtra

Action has been taken against Abu Azmi in the Maharashtra Assembly. Abu Azmi has been suspended from the entire budget session. He had praised Aurangzeb and said that he was not a tyrant. His statement had heated up the politics for the last two days. However, later he apologized for his statement. He also said that he is only saying what is written in history. Abu Azmi is constantly being targeted by the opponents due to this comment. There was a demand to suspend him from the budget session of the Maharashtra Assembly.

Akhilesh Yadav raises question on suspension of Abu Azmi:

Samajwadi Party leader Akhilesh Yadav has raised question on the action taken against party MLA Abu Azmi in Maharashtra. 

If the basis of suspension starts getting influenced by ideology, then what difference will remain between freedom of expression and slavery. Whether it is our MLAs or MPs, their fearless wisdom is unmatched. If some people think that by 'suspension', one can put a rein on the tongue of truth, then this is the childishness of their negative thinking.

- Akhilesh Yadav

What did Abu Azmi say? 

Azmi had said that the kings of that time struggled for power and wealth, but it was nothing religious. Aurangzeb ruled for 52 years, and if he really wanted to convert Hindus to Muslims, imagine how many Hindus would have converted. If Aurangzeb destroyed temples, he also destroyed mosques. If he was against Hindus, 34% Hindus would not have been with him, and his advisors would not have been Hindus. We do not need to give it a Hindu-Muslim angle. This country will run by the Constitution, and I have not said a single word against Hindu brothers. The SP leader said that what I said is based on facts. History should be seen on the basis of truth, not political agenda. I believe in the Constitution and equality. 

The controversy started with the film Chhava

The recently released film 'Chhava' started a debate about Aurangzeb. This film is based on the life of Sambhaji Maharaj, the second ruler of the Maratha Empire and the eldest son of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj. Vicky Kaushal has played the role of Sambhaji in the film, while Akshay Khanna has played the role of Aurangzeb. The film shows Sambhaji's courage, sacrifice and Aurangzeb's atrocities. Sambhaji was brutally killed by Aurangzeb in 1689, which has been tried to be presented emotionally in the film. 

PC:NDTV