On Monday the Supreme Court declares its decision to allow a rape survivor from Mumbai to abort her 24-week-old irregular foetus, a High Court here directed that a medical board be constituted by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) to decide if there is a danger to the life of a 16-year-old if her pregnancy is sustained. Justice AK Pathak, who took the current ruling of the Supreme Court in to thought and also additional current judgments by other state high courts, empirical: "It would be suitable to leave it to the doctors a choice on whether the continuation of pregnancy is a threat to the life of Ms. X." The rape survivor had first move toward the HC on July 18. Though, an account present by the Deen Dayal University, as directed by the HC, was questionable as it affirmed that the continuation of the pregnancy would be a danger to the minor’s life, and an abortion at this late stage would also be hazardous to the mother. Justice Pathak canceled the report on account of its vagueness and on the fact that a clinical psychologist was absent throughout evaluation of the minor – as mandated. The Court also conveyed that, if the specialist decides to go in front with the extinction, the physician shall perform the essential surgery without further teaching from the court.
According to the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act (MTPA), 1971 – that was confront by the minor, a woman is allowable to terminate her pregnancy between 12 to 20 weeks, only if two record practitioners express their common opinion that continuation of pregnancy would threaten the mother's life or that the foetus has severe abnormalities. Though, there is a stipulation in the Act that permit the termination of pregnancy subsequent to 24 weeks if there is a threat to the life of the mother. The HC perceived mental stress to comprise suicide and included that as a danger to the life of the mother. Additional Standing Counsel Nandita Rao, appearing for the state conveyed, "Justice Pathak, in view of the young age of the fatality and the unlucky circumstance of her pregnancy, has grip the case with great compassion." In an event of an abortion, the court additional directed hankie samples of the foetus to be potted as samples for the examination and prosecution in the rape case the minor has filed subsequently to her rapists. According to a First Information Report filed (FIR), the minor was kidnapped by two persons, Naresh and Rahul Bhandari, and unlawfully detained by them since January 30, 2014. More than two years afterward the minor returned back to her parents. In June, the minor exposed she was approximately 22 weeks pregnant, following which she sought the court's consent to terminate her pregnancy.