Amid a late visit to Bihar, Prime Minister Narendra Modi lauded Chief Minister Nitish Kumar for his liquor ban arrangement. He stated: "I welcome Nitish Kumar from the center of my heart for propelling a battle against alcohol. In any case, this work (forbiddance) would not be a stupendous achievement just by endeavors of Nitish Kumar or one gathering. All the political gatherings, social associations and subjects need to take part in it to make it a 'jan-jan ka andolan' (people protest)."
In April 2016, Nitish Kumar reported a prohibition on the deal and utilization of alcohol in the state. The ban was one of murmur key survey guarantees made to ladies voters-who encouraged behind him firmly.
Thirty days after the ban, Nitish Kumar asserted that the wrongdoing was down 27 for every penny, as per his examination of wrongdoing information from April 2016 and April 2015.
Nine months – or 270 days – into the ban, an IndiaSpend examination of Bihar Police wrongdoing information, uncovers that cognizable wrongdoing – which the police can research without an officer's request – rose 13 for each penny amongst April and October 2016, from 14,279 in April to 16,153 in October (the most recent accessible information).
At the end of the day, the alcohol ban does not connect with a drop in wrongdoing, an essential explanation behind the new law, which appeared in spite of the Patna High Court holding it violative of the constitution since it denied residents their entitlement to protection under Article 21.
Conviction of offenders in Bihar had declined 68 for every penny, from 14,311 in 2010 to 4,513 in 2015, and cognizable wrongdoings rose 42 for each penny over a similar period, IndiaSpend announced in May 2016.
Each real wrongdoing – kill, assault, abducting, revolting – expanded in the months taking after the alcohol ban.
Bihar has a lower wrongdoing rate than more prosperous states with less individuals, for example, Gujarat, Kerala, Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh, chiefly due to under-revealing, IndiaSpend detailed in May 2016.
The Patna High Court had subdued the liquor boycott in September 2016, naming the Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act 2016, "illicit". The new Bill gave discipline that included captures of all grown-ups in the family in the event that anybody stores or expends liquor. Those spurning the boycott confront up to 10 years in prison, and a fine of up to Rs 10 lakh ($14,500). In the event that an administration bill is struck around the courts, authoritative authorize can change over it into a law that the courts can't meddle with. That is the thing that occurred in Bihar.